We now present some major results in the theory of functions of a complex variable. The first one is known as Cauchy ’s integral formula. It shows that the value of an analytic function \(f\) can be represented by a certain contour integral. The \(n^{th}\) derivative, \(f^{(n)}(z)\text{,}\) has a similar representation. In Chapter 7, we use these results to prove Taylor’s theorem and also establish the power series representation for analytic functions. The Cauchy integral formulas are a convenient tool for evaluating certain contour integrals.
Theorem6.5.1.Cauchy ’s integral formula.
Let \(f\) be analytic in the simply connected domain \(D\) and let \(C\) be a simple closed positively oriented contour that lies in \(D\text{.}\) If \(z_0\) is a point that lies interior to \(C\text{,}\) then
Because \(f\) is continuous at \(z_0\text{,}\) if \(\varepsilon >0\) is given there is a \(\delta >0\) such that the positively oriented circle \(C_0=\{z:|z-z_0| = \frac{1}{2}\delta\}\) lies interior to \(C\) (as Figure 6.5.2 shows) and such that
This proves the theorem because \(\varepsilon\) can be made arbitrarily small.
Example6.5.3.
Show that \(\int_{C_2^+(0)}\frac{\exp z}{z-1}\,dz = i 2\pi e\text{.}\)
Solution.
Recall that \(C_2^+(0)\) is the circle centered at 0 with radius 2 and having positive orientation. We have \(f(z) = \exp z\) and \(f(1)=e\text{.}\) The point \(z_0=1\) lies interior to the circle, so Cauchy ’s integral formula implies that
\begin{equation*}
e = f(1) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_C\frac{\exp z}{z-1}\,dz\text{.}
\end{equation*}
Multiplication by \(2\pi i\) establishes the desired result.
Example6.5.4.
Show that \(\int_{C_1^+(0)}\frac{\sin z}{4z+\pi}\,dz = i\left(-\frac{\sqrt{2}\pi}{4}\right)\text{.}\)
Solution.
Here we have \(f(z) = \sin z\text{.}\) We manipulate the integral and use Cauchy ’s integral formula to obtain
Show that \(\displaystyle\int_{C_1^+(0)}\frac{\exp (i\pi z)}{2z^2-5z+2}\,dz=\frac{2\pi}{3}\text{.}\)
Solution.
We see that \(2z^2-5z+2 = (2z-1)(z-2) = \frac{1}{2}(z-\frac{1}{2})(z-2)\text{.}\) The only zero of this expression that lies in the interior of \(C_1(0)\) is \(z_0 = \frac{1}{2}\text{.}\) We set \(f(z) = \frac{\exp (i\pi z)}{{z-2}}\) and use Theorem 6.5.1 to conclude that
We now state a general result that shows how to accomplish differentiation under the integral sign. The proof is in some advanced texts. See, for instance, Rolf Nevanlinna and V. Paatero, Introduction to Complex Analysis (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969), Section 9.7.
Theorem6.5.6.Leibniz’s rule.
Let \(G\) be an open set and let \(I:a \le t \le b\) be an interval of real numbers. Let \(g(z,t)\) and its partial derivative \(g_{z}(z,t)\) with respect to \(z\) be continuous functions for all \(z\) in \(G\) and all \(t\) in \(I\text{.}\) Then \(F(z) = \int_a^bg(z,t)\,dt\) is analytic for \(z\) in \(G\text{,}\) and \(F\,'(z) = \int_a^bg_z(z,t)\,dt\text{.}\)
We now generalize Theorem 6.5.1 to give an integral representation for the \(n\)th derivative, \(f^{(n)}(z)\text{.}\) We use Leibniz’s rule in the proof and note that this method of proof serves as a mnemonic device for remembering Theorem 6.5.7.
Theorem6.5.7.Cauchy ’s integral formulas for derivatives.
Let \(f\) be analytic in the simply connected domain \(D\) and let \(C\) be a simple closed positively oriented contour that lies in \(D\text{.}\) If \(z\) is a point that lies interior to C, then for any integer \(n \ge 0\text{,}\)
Because \(f^{(0)}(z) = f(z)\text{,}\) the case for \(n=0\) reduces to Theorem 6.5.1. We now establish the theorem for the case \(n=1\text{.}\) We start by using the parametrization
\begin{equation*}
C:\xi =\xi (t) \text{ and } d\,\xi = \xi \,'(t)\,dt, \text{ for } a \le t \le b\text{.}
\end{equation*}
Moreover, \(g(z,t)\) and \(g_{z}(z,t)\) are continuous on the interior of \(C\text{,}\) which is an open set. Applying Leibniz’s rule to Equations (6.5.6) gives
and the proof for the case \(n=1\) is complete. We can apply the same argument to the analytic function \(f\,'\) and show that its derivative \(f\,''\) is also represented by Equation (6.5.5) for \(n=2\text{.}\) The principle of mathematical induction establishes the theorem for all integers \(n \ge 0\text{.}\)
Example6.5.8.
Let \(z_0\) denote a fixed complex value. Show that, if \(C\) is a simple closed positively oriented contour such that \(z_0\) lies interior to \(C\text{,}\) then for any integer \(n \ge 1\text{,}\)
\begin{equation}
\int_C\frac{1}{z-z_0}\,dz=2\pi i \text{ and } \int_C\frac{1}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}}\,dz = 0\text{.}\tag{6.5.7}
\end{equation}
Solution.
We let \(f(z)=1\text{.}\) Then \(f^{(n)}(z)=0\) for \(n \ge 1\text{.}\)Theorem 6.5.1 implies that the value of the first integral in Equations (6.5.7) is
\begin{equation*}
\int_C\frac{1}{z-z_0}\,dz = 2\pi i f(z_0)=2\pi i\text{.}
\end{equation*}
Show that \(\displaystyle\int_{C_2^+(0)}\frac{\exp z^2}{(z-i)^4}\,dz = \frac{-4\pi}{3e}\text{.}\)
Solution.
If we let \(f(z)=\exp z^2\text{,}\) then a straightforward calculation shows that \(f^{(3)}(z)=(12z+8z^3) \exp z^2\text{.}\) Using Cauchy ’s integral formulas with \(n=3\text{,}\) we conclude that
We now state two important corollaries of Theorem 6.5.7.
Corollary6.5.10.
If \(f\) is analytic in the domain \(D\text{,}\) then, for integers \(n \ge 0\text{,}\) all derivatives \(f\,^{(n)}(z)\) exist for \(z\in D\) (and therefore are analytic in \(D\)).
Proof.
For each point \(z_0\) in \(D\text{,}\) there exists a closed disk \(\left\vert z-z_0\right\vert \le R\) that is contained in \(D\text{.}\) We use the circle \(C=C_R(z_0)=\{z:|z-z_0|=R\}\) in Theorem 6.5.7 to show that \(f^{(n)}(z_0)\) exists for all integers \(n \ge 0\text{.}\)
Remark6.5.11.
This result is interesting, as it illustrates a big difference between real and complex functions. A real function \(f\) can have the property that \(f\,'\) exists everywhere in a domain \(D\text{,}\) but \(f\,''\) exists nowhere. Corollary 6.5.10 states that if a complex function \(f\) has the property that \(f\,'\) exists everywhere in a domain \(D\text{,}\) then, remarkably, all derivatives of \(f\) exist in \(D\text{.}\)
Corollary6.5.12.
If \(u\) is a harmonic function at each point \((x,y)\) in the domain \(D\text{,}\) then all partial derivatives \(u_x, \, u_y, \, u_{xx}, \, u_{xy}\text{,}\) and \(u_{yy}\) exist and are harmonic functions.
Proof.
For each point \(z_0=(x_0, y_0)\) in \(D\) there exists a disk \(D_R(z_0)\) that is contained in \(D\text{.}\) In this disk, a conjugate harmonic function \(v\) exists, so the function \(f(z) =u+iv\) is analytic. We use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to get \(f\,'(z)=u_x+iv_x=v_y-iu_y\text{,}\) for \(z\in D_R(z_0)\text{.}\) Since \(f\,'\) is analytic in \(D_R(z_0)\text{,}\) the functions \(u_x\) and \(u_y\) are harmonic there. Again, we can use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to obtain, for \(z\in D_R(z_0)\text{,}\)
Let \(f\) be analytic in the simply connected domain \(D\) and let \(z_1\) and \(z_2\) be two complex numbers that lie interior to the simple closed contour \(C\) having positive orientation that lies in \(D\text{.}\) Show that
where \(C\) is a simple closed contour having positive orientation and \(z\) lies inside \(C\text{.}\)
Solution.
Let \(f(z)=(z^2-1)^n\text{,}\) which is analytic everywhere. By Cauchy ’s integral formulas, \(P_n(z) = \frac{1}{2^nn!}f\,^{(n)}(z) = \frac{1}{2^nn!}\left[\frac{n!}{2\pi i}\int_{C}\frac{f(\xi)}{(\xi -z)^{n+1}}\,d\xi\right]\text{.}\) The conclusion follows from this result. Show the details.
20.
Discuss the importance of being able to define an analytic function \(f(z)\) with the contour integral in Formula (6.5.1). How does this definition differ from other definitions of a function that you have learned?